
WTF will our govt. think of next? This retard James Oberstar and some other congressmen are pushing for GPS tracking in YOUR vehicle!!! I’ll go to prison before they get one in my car.
Article below for all who haven’t read
Despite opposition from the White House, a proposal to tax motorists on the number of miles they drive each year is gathering speed on Capitol Hill.
Its popularity is increasing as Congress searches for alternatives to the federal gasoline tax, which isn’t indexed to inflation and hasn’t been raised since 1993.
Supporters say that a mileage tax would be a more reliable source of funding for the upkeep of the nation’s roads and bridges. Many environmentalists endorse it, saying that it would lead to less driving and less pollution.
However, the proposal is raising privacy concerns – particularly if GPS devices were to monitor mileage – and opponents say that the last thing people need is a new tax, particularly in the middle of a recession. Some critics, moreover, fear that it would have a disproportionate impact in states such as California, which has longer-than-average commutes.
A bipartisan commission that Congress created said last week that lawmakers should increase the gasoline tax by 10 cents per gallon but begin shifting to a mileage tax.
“With the expected shift to more fuel-efficient vehicles, it will be increasingly difficult to rely on the gas tax to raise the funds needed to improve – let alone maintain – our nation’s surface transportation infrastructure,” said Robert Atkinson, the chairman of the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission.
The idea is nothing new in Congress.
At a hearing last year, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., called the mileage tax a brilliant idea.
Last week, after the White House said it would oppose such a tax, Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn., rushed to its defense, saying that the new administration should be “open to new ideas and open to dialogue.”
“Whether they want it or not, they are going to get it,“ Oberstar said in a speech to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
The opinions of the two veteran lawmakers carry punch because they head the Senate and House of Representatives transportation committees, which oversee the country’s infrastructure. With Boxer and Oberstar promising to examine the mileage tax as an option, the idea is sure to create a lively debate this year.
The proposal has plenty of skeptics.
“The gas tax strikes me as being far more appropriate,” said freshman Republican Rep. Tom McClintock of California, adding that it automatically provides a discount for lighter vehicles. “The heavier and less efficient your car … the more gas you consume, and therefore the more tax you pay.”
In addition, McClintock said, a mileage tax could result in the government’s making “arbitrary distinctions,” taxing the number of miles driven in different types of vehicles at different rates.
The proposal already is fueling privacy concerns.
Critics are objecting to proposals to use Global Positioning System devices to keep track of how many miles drivers log and where they go. The technology is part of federally funded test projects that are under way in Oregon and elsewhere.
When transportation officials pitched the idea at a committee hearing last year, Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, the senior Republican on the panel, told them: “Don’t waste your time on that one. It ain’t going to happen.”
Best Answer: GPS would be needlessly expensive just to keep track of a tax.
A simpler way (and I am NOT advocating they do this) is just to raise the gasoline tax-number of miles driven is proportional to amount of gas used, and high-mileage cars are taxed less than low-mileage cars. No extra expense, same result.
If people are seriously advocating GPS, they have some other reason.
- The concept is the same as using a toll road where you pay by the mile.
- Why don’t they just put a GPS tracker in my chest? That way they can tax every breath I breathe.
- Personally I think it’s a really dumb idea. Aside from the obvious huge expense to implement and maintain it, it takes away the penalty that people currently pay to drive gas guzzlers, and takes away incentive for people to drive cars that get good mileage.